Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:15:19 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
Cc:        "Leonardo M. Ram?" <martinrame@yahoo.com>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net>
Subject:   Re: fsck_ufs running too often
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK2q_9=cp6tQ__H9U9UDvbvmocF3sgc7jx_yYjRqALv01A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net>
References:  <1340401637.32116.YahooMailNeo@web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <3729A720-2C8F-4C84-B05A-201394C40D63@gothic.net.au> <20120624013624.GG24842@portland1.byshenk.net> <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>wrote:
>
> At one point it was proven that background fsck was not benefitial.


Where can we find this "proof"?

-- 
Adam Vande More



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2q_9=cp6tQ__H9U9UDvbvmocF3sgc7jx_yYjRqALv01A>