From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 03:15:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5F8106566C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667258FC19 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so6271640lbo.13 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mAB7m4v+lsh3XRWdh9Gh2gAc0qVOsrKOsg6jom7Hr3s=; b=M62SLg9tmH/1aKtYSsGkr9HhdJp5iFM7ijjoeqp5gWGE8U/d8Otv0Ia9buu5LBfhH3 BpvrGGagXVo0HSEuchrR/4kSKDJcnC5WgmvHh+IjcXdqVzOFbp1FpttOvdH88Qy3iDQK ifrfsfQzYhBli4n8NYoXIa+gI5dNTraxogN9paMqHgahJfu/OfZiz8GreXW+3OxBdnTx pAV/ytLL5u1rKAn5+Cy8dgeHgtNZXY5XhYX4+SHCVYxoDi2iAPd5gj/ByQWAbiT8B9y+ 4/iU3cEJWIFnI/nwSQ95lsCaEWkqEkob2TY8HEBXHTp3j0tKc8eJNxqa7ot/y//uud5g 88bA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.148.195 with SMTP id tu3mr7124931lab.16.1340507719077; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.26.132 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:15:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net> References: <1340401637.32116.YahooMailNeo@web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <3729A720-2C8F-4C84-B05A-201394C40D63@gothic.net.au> <20120624013624.GG24842@portland1.byshenk.net> <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:15:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Jason Hellenthal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Leonardo M. Ram?" , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Greg Byshenk Subject: Re: fsck_ufs running too often X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:15:21 -0000 On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > At one point it was proven that background fsck was not benefitial. Where can we find this "proof"? -- Adam Vande More