Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 18:50:11 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: tsikora@powerusersbbs.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JFS Message-ID: <101770000.994546208@vpn39.ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B479008.19BFE7F2@home.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107080938430.326-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> <3B479008.19BFE7F2@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, July 07, 2001 18:41:12 -0400, Ted Sikora <tsikora@home.com> wrote: +----- | Juha Saarinen wrote: | > | > On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: | > | > > I use "logging" on Solaris and XFS on Linux and have tried reiserfs on | > > Linux. All are superior to UFS/softupdates when the going gets tough. | > > Disk access times may or may not be comparable with UFS/softupdates, | > > but the integrity of my filesystems is more important than raw speed. | > | > Hmmm... that's one reason I've not implemented ReiserFS on my Linux box. | > Read too many horror stories about how it eats your file system, and how | > it doesn't work with NFS etc. | | Absolutely false. Works perfectly... I have had it on several machines +--->8 I think it depends on which ReiserFS you're using: the development snapshots that show up in various kernels from Linus or as patches to same, or the polished release-quality ones that show up in some Linux distributions. I've been using reiserfs as provided by SuSE for over a year without problems; but I've heard plenty of horror stories about various bleeding-edge patches. -- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?101770000.994546208>