From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 10 16:30:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3247106564A; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AB48FC08; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6AGTkag017398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:29:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <4E193D8F.8020304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:29:33 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <09A31F44-A572-4B8A-BC57-3DC15D6F1B80@bsdimp.com> References: <201107080135.p681ZXZu087112@svn.freebsd.org> <4E19321F.1090801@FreeBSD.org> <4E193D8F.8020304@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:29:46 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Tai-hwa Liang , Craig Rodrigues , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r223854 - head/lib/libstand X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:30:03 -0000 On Jul 9, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/09/2011 22:25, Warner Losh wrote: >> Having the low WARNS=3D today motivates people to fix stuff... >=20 > I see absolutely no evidence of that, but it's clear that your opinion > is not likely to change, so I'll leave it alone. As someone who usually has to fix things when people screw up, I'm very = familiar with the problem and when people fix things for the better. There is one lingering problem in the area: the socket interface is safe = from an alignment point of view, but we haven't tagged the structures = properly to keep the compiler happy. Turns out to be kinda tricky... Warner