From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org  Wed Aug 17 10:32:02 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05789BBC7DD;
 Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:32:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com (cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com
 [195.16.150.151])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66C51DAF;
 Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from [172.16.8.36] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11])
 by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEBFA9DC9EE;
 Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:31:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Is it me or is FreeBSD slower on Xen than Linux?
From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <23f4fbc340f9cf51ee65bbd148706649@ultra-secure.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:31:57 +0200
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
 freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0CF8B21F-2728-426B-B81E-C9043148CBD9@sarenet.es>
References: <20160816110759.6xlvxikw3tziahfd@mac>
 <c3a3a7da26cd1a6a114c03e823926272@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816132938.d2i4u2y3scpzi2et@mac>
 <00D22384-BAA7-42E4-A486-4BE07562D011@sarenet.es>
 <8521aebaa093bcefe5956a71fd879140@ultra-secure.de>
 <872C5626-F58D-4F84-92AC-88B7352D1DDF@sarenet.es>
 <c6bdef83f2370173c067820565bf933e@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816141826.56mxsgx6e7rynxqg@mac>
 <cff064d12c783cc6eebba4b56f063ba7@ultra-secure.de>
 <599395934f751784b1f842ed3c8f879c@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160817091229.hm5a66ftwnfoj7vx@mac>
 <23f4fbc340f9cf51ee65bbd148706649@ultra-secure.de>
To: rainer@ultra-secure.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:32:02 -0000


> On 17 Aug 2016, at 12:17, rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>=20
> I played a bit with the "OS-Type".
> If I switch to "Other PV", I can get a bit more throughput (10MB/s).
>=20
> Still too slow :-(

Can it be a problem with the sync cache commands? Just wondering what =
could be
so different with Linux vs FreeBSD. At least in the past the Linux crowd =
has chosen to=20
be lousy with committing data do disk and relying on fsck.

FreeBSD does the opposite.





Borja.