From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 15:35:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4398C3AC; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3368E2F40; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA11893; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:35:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VbBJv-0005dH-7R; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:35:03 +0200 Message-ID: <526FD56F.7040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:34:07 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hwpstate0: set freq failed patch References: <1383058810.14878.40267333.50100861@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1383058810.14878.40267333.50100861@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hiren@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:35:06 -0000 on 29/10/2013 17:00 Mark Felder said the following: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27, Claudio Zumbo wrote: >> Hello, >> Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release? >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html >> >> I've tested it on an amd 6600k and it seems to be working, a quick google >> search shows other people have had good results on different cpus. >> > > I saw you in #bsddev this morning. > > PR in question: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167018 > > CCing hiren@ and avg@ > > I have no idea if this can make it in 10, but we're still in BETA. It > would be nice if powerd worked out of the box on those chips. > I am *not* looking into this. -- Andriy Gapon