From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 4 13:02:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496F4106566B for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marco@tolstoy.tols.org) Received: from tolstoy.tols.org (tolstoy.tols.org [IPv6:2a02:898:0:20::57:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99298FC24 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tolstoy.tols.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tolstoy.tols.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o74D1xCG025658 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:01:59 GMT (envelope-from marco@tolstoy.tols.org) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at tolstoy.tols.org Received: (from marco@localhost) by tolstoy.tols.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o74D1xhY025657 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:01:59 GMT (envelope-from marco) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:01:59 +0000 From: Marco van Tol To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100804130159.GA25479@tolstoy.tols.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <201008042008.25679.alexvpetrov@gmail.com> <4C5960E6.7060702@icyb.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5960E6.7060702@icyb.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on tolstoy.tols.org Subject: Re: zpool - low speed write X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:02:03 -0000 On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:45:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 04/08/2010 15:08 Alex V. Petrov said the following: > > Hi All! > > > > $ dd if=/dev/random of=/tank/test bs=3M count=1000 > > /dev/random is slow. For comparing, try to see what happens with /dev/zero. :) -- Als het niet gaat zoals het moet, dan moet het zoals het gaat.