From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 10 09:55:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA11199 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 10 May 1997 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (cedb.DPCSYS.com [209.25.4.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11193 for ; Sat, 10 May 1997 09:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id QAA05828; Sat, 10 May 1997 16:54:03 GMT Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 09:54:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow To: Gilbert Bollinger cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SuperMicro P6DNF In-Reply-To: <3373CBD6.8B125857@nalu.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 9 May 1997, Gilbert Bollinger wrote: > drives. We are running the FreeBSD v3.0 CURRENT. We only use 1 > proccessor. We keep having reboots about 4 or 6 times a day. FreeBSD As long as you are only using a single processor you should go with 2.1.7 or 2.2.1. I wouldn't suggest running production machines on 3.0 without a compelling reason. > And would we hav any problems going back to 2.2 stable if we had to? You'll have to recompile all of your programs, rm the existing [uw]tmp files and make sure your user's logins are only 8 characters max. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82