From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Nov 25 12:30:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA58737B479 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:30:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA55855; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:30:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:30:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011252030.MAA55855@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Meyer Subject: Re: misc/23094: The PR system has no way to let committers know that a PR includes commitable code Reply-To: Mike Meyer Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/23094; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Meyer To: Bill Fumerola Cc: mwm@mired.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/23094: The PR system has no way to let committers know that a PR includes commitable code Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:26:02 -0600 (CST) Bill Fumerola types: > On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 08:13:22PM -0000, mwm@mired.org wrote: > > >Category: misc > > >Synopsis: The PR system has no way to let committers know that a PR includes commitable code > > typically, one uses [PATCH] at the beginning of "synopsis" to indicate > that a patch is in the PR. Is this documented anywhere? What about man pages, FAQ submission (though those are the exceptions to this problem), and new ports?