From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Jul 11 20:12: 4 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E142F37BB53; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from archie@whistle.com)
Received: (from archie@localhost)
	by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA41826;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
Message-Id: <200007120310.UAA41826@bubba.whistle.com>
Subject: Re: ether_ifattach()/ether_ifdetach() patch
In-Reply-To: <396BB40C.41C67EA6@elischer.org> from Julian Elischer at "Jul 11, 2000 04:55:56 pm"
To: julian@elischer.org (Julian Elischer)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, csg@waterspout.om, ache@freebsd.org,
	wpaul@freebsd.org, imp@village.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Julian Elischer writes:
> >   ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/ETHERATTACH.patch.2
> ok so you use ETHER_BPF_SUPPORTED...
> 
> but I never saw a case where it was not supported..
> why is it needed?

So drivers explicitly have to declare it.. otherwise it's not obvious
that supporting BPF is required.

-Archie

___________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs   *   Whistle Communications, Inc.  *   http://www.whistle.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message