Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: julian@elischer.org (Julian Elischer) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, csg@waterspout.om, ache@freebsd.org, wpaul@freebsd.org, imp@village.org Subject: Re: ether_ifattach()/ether_ifdetach() patch Message-ID: <200007120310.UAA41826@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <396BB40C.41C67EA6@elischer.org> from Julian Elischer at "Jul 11, 2000 04:55:56 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer writes: > > ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/ETHERATTACH.patch.2 > ok so you use ETHER_BPF_SUPPORTED... > > but I never saw a case where it was not supported.. > why is it needed? So drivers explicitly have to declare it.. otherwise it's not obvious that supporting BPF is required. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007120310.UAA41826>