From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 27 14:10:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD2616A405 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986B713C4B6 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0REAqAS015974; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:10:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 80D8FB827; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:10:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:10:52 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: JoaoBR Message-ID: <20070127141052.GA96039@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: JoaoBR , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br> <20070127041608.GG927@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200701271058.47517.joao@matik.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701271058.47517.joao@matik.com.br> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:10:56 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:58:46AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote: > also a point to think about, most complains about spam talk about bandwid= th=20 > consumption, by asking for resend later you certainly increase bandwidth= =20 > consumption and resources on both sides Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request. That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase bandwidth consumption. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFu11sEnfvsMMhpyURArllAJ90jGssvAVqls/Yb+ThkmtwJTRtWQCfbeG/ +a/ZlPFp46ycZMFPmK7opE4= =Mlmf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--