From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 9 14:30:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4093914D75A for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46pGpy0zvfz4Vfb; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E62A814AD7; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 794F0333E2; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:30:48 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jan Beich Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <20191009143048.zliwcrjx7ahe67a7@ivaldir.net> References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dmniuyyougrrt5nl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:30:50 -0000 --dmniuyyougrrt5nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:14:13PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > > Yasuhiro KIMURA writes: > >=20 > > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate > > > IPV6 options by default everywhere". > > > > > > And now we are in 2019. IPv6 is more widely used than 2012. So I > > > wonder if IPV6 option is still necessary. > >=20 > > ipv6 in CATEGORIES is also of dubious value nowadays. For one, > > www/firefox has "ipv6" while www/chromium does not. >=20 > This one is even easier to fix ;) >=20 Done. Now we can get back on the ipv6 option. so if we want to proceed further in removing the option to build with or wi= thout ipv6 for the ports side. Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for = it. How bad it will impact you if we do remove that option? Best regards, Bapt --dmniuyyougrrt5nl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl2d7xQACgkQY4mL3PG3 PloZWhAAtL0iAAkARG2/H6nlqL52J4WsR/g6MdtHuG97yd7cS6fSp15odY7o1u+b xWIObStVOiiRfroqLnm4JwhY6ZbGOLWHHNvcqSyG//B/Af0WEq8gLfQiiULmVwuz SVBJmCQSPxDmAqiyWq9iLQsUZK7pMfRmz8NTDG/UD2oUeY7yz1hTJACqmEOhtcDq 37I7qHzmp1vs0PnG2gMlQuHPgq+yyQItnZVOzE+Niazw7a3k0j+bo2uAUDLHpqTp eEGjQc5r7s7PGM1YvzBCXYVrHFCWaNAE6paB2G4vny1eDTi/d8hyuhXFv3t6nwx6 jQOS+IKaSKxqz/d3Y8LF59bTd3PFoJk0ZjXikQUsD1NOoUA3w/0wt4kv9yFMS6il PRvTZ5TtumSMR0qeEepbU2yBDmHON2SpP+FW5gU7pf4Om8msg/6Q1Rgq5GAxJQeu w02H4ginsISl7EN3O7KbCvSYqiRA+Lnrv80ojPYng+KDX5+4T93kcE5PRpy4x1RF x2giTjpB4NssQac0i4DRG3a14boAfle37khSJSLHarvF7SnUB/+hbmxcQO5WcC1b s6CTK/n1hTw+s5EIqY3jzH00ezmCBre2YUfHdBZ2c9DmhLpxSimqjyScqzQuhwDS TeofqdM/ak9e4mDU6m6EHYY6dJVO7qkaiiK5YVOpvo27hmBP1Jc= =ktxL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dmniuyyougrrt5nl--