From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 21:42:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19CF37B401 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 21:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A243F93 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 21:42:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <2003050704423000200ffheqe>; Wed, 7 May 2003 04:42:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:42:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030506214205.F5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Trashed a UFS2 file system from 4.8-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 04:42:32 -0000 Ok, I'm a big loser, and for some reason I thought that I should be able to fsck and mount a 5.0-Current UFS2 file system from 4.8-Release. Now I know you can't do that. :) So, the question is, if RELENG_4 fsck doesn't grok UFS2 file systems, why did it try to fsck it? Shouldn't it just give up when it realizes that it's not a UFS1 fs? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection