From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 01:24:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3649B1065672 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88F68FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD05A5C28 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:37:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B684D5C22 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:37:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F5AAC12.80302@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:19:14 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C0F7421AA759346AF17299922AD57EB05B0E2@Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> <201203100807.22274.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <201203100807.22274.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:24:27 -0000 On 03/10/12 11:07, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday 10 March 2012 07:57:59 Graeme Dargie wrote: >> >> I try not to reply to these things, but I have to say this bloke is having a proper tin bath (laugh) in development since 1996 their website proudly claims, and here we are in 2012 and it is still an alpha! >> > you can see on this how difficult it is to be 100% compatible with Windows. Especially the Virus layer of Windows is hard to redo. > > It is a masterpiece on its own. ROFL!