From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 12:33:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E08416A417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D079113C46B for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F042BAF7 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:33:33 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at post.raad.tartu.ee Received: from kuller.raad.tartu.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kuller.raad.tartu.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEdMTLGHb7mP for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:33:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from raad.tartu.ee (lv.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.110]) by kuller.raad.tartu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6ACB819 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:33:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from INFO/SpoolDir by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48); 23 Nov 07 14:33:30 +0200 Received: from SpoolDir by INFO (Mercury 1.48); 23 Nov 07 14:33:26 +0200 Received: from [172.26.1.6] (172.26.1.6) by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP; 23 Nov 07 14:33:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4746C893.1090305@raad.tartu.ee> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:33:23 +0200 From: Toomas Aas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: "conatainer" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:33:51 -0000 With RELENG_7 source cvsupped 3 days ago, I noticed several occurrences of word "conatainer" in sys/dev/aac/aac_debug.c case AifJobCtrZero: /* Container clear operation */ device_printf(sc->aac_dev, "(ConatainerZero) container %d\n", aif->data.PR[0].jd.client.container.src); break; case AifJobCtrCopy: /* Container copy operation */ device_printf(sc->aac_dev, "(ConatainerCopy) container %d to %d\n", aif->data.PR[0].jd.client.container.src, aif->data.PR[0].jd.client.container.dst); ...and so on. A lot of aac debug messages talk about "Conatainer" something or other. Shouldn't it be "Container"? English is not my native language, so I didn't want to file a PR in case there actually is a word "conatainer" in English language. -- Toomas Aas