From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 19:10:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683AD1065675 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429E58FC18 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7EJ9wwf070374; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7EJ9w3t070373; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:09:58 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20120814190958.GA70225@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <502A8CCC.5080606@missouri.edu> <20120814175257.GA69865@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120814183518.GA70092@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <502A9E82.9090905@missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502A9E82.9090905@missouri.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of expl logl X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:10:00 -0000 On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 08/14/2012 01:35 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:52:57AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > >>On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:37:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >>>Are people working on expl, logl and log1pl? > >>> > >> > > > >I forgot to mention that if you're looking for another > >function to implement, then AFAIK no one is working on > >ld80/powl() and ld128/powl(). See the comment in > >src/e_pow.c for the algorithm used in fdlibm. > > > > > What is the logic that dictates the file names in msun/src? > > Some are s_foo.c, some are e_foo.c, some are k_foo.c, etc. See http://www.netlib.org/fdlibm/readme, section 3. -- Steve