From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Aug 4 13:36:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [204.188.6.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52E7D14CDE for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unfurl@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 90738 invoked by uid 1001); 4 Aug 1999 20:35:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:35:49 -0700 From: Bill Swingle To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: [unfurl@dub.net: Re: advocacy site] Message-ID: <19990804133549.B90687@dub.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Bill Swingle wrote: > > > These are exactly the issues that need to be resolved. The idea of a > > database back end for the content is nice but is it really necessary? If > > we can for go the DB backend, integration with the existing site would > > be much easier. I think that solving this one issue would make the others > > quite a bit more addressable :) > > True, however, with a website that should be very dynamic, do you want to > see 500(well, not that many) commits a day to an advocacy tree? true, but I am having a hard time remembering what parts of the site nreally need to be all that dynamic. Certainly a lot of the site could easily be static, with thigns such as PR's and news as exceptions. Or I may be smoking from the wrong end of the pipe again. Who knows. -Bill -- -=| Bill Swingle - unfurl@dub.net - unfurl@freebsd.org - bill@cdrom.com -=| "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers" Pablo Picasso To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message