From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 10 10:10:15 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DC816A4B3
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF62943F75
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9AHAEFY096504
	for <freebsd-doc@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9AHAEC0096503;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200310101710.h9AHAEC0096503@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:10:15 -0000

The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:03:31 -0400

 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300
 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote:
 
 > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 > > [...]
 > > > >  >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 > > >
 > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something
 > > > this trivial to a past release branch?  The GENERIC config file
 > > > explains what devices require miibus(4).  So does the handbook,
 > > > and the LINT file.
 > > 
 > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 > 
 > Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 > the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 > formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 > to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 > that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 > shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 > 
 > This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 > committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 I've done so much -doc that I completely forgot that I did this!
 
 Thanks for pointing this out, I think this PR can be closed now.  What
 does our submitter say?
 
 -- 
 Tom Rhodes