From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 9 12:03:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA21149 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:03:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA21140 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:03:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA27031; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd027029; Thu Oct 9 18:52:30 1997 Message-ID: <343D27A8.167EB0E7@whistle.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 11:51:20 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Annelise Anderson CC: Greg Lehey , Robert Rusk , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs freeBSD References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Annelise Anderson wrote: > > > Is the FreeBSD network code still better than Linux? not really. The NFS code still lags. they re-wrote their networking top work along similar lines toours (except with a more modern approach) it works well. >