From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 19 20:07:47 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C579310656C5
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com)
Received: from proxy2.bredband.net (proxy2.bredband.net [195.54.101.72])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C84C8FC17
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (195.54.127.164) by proxy2.bredband.net
	(7.3.140.3) id 4AD3E1BC01DAE179 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:46 +0100
X-SMTPAUTH-B2: 
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao1gADPBLEtV44PPPGdsb2JhbACBS4cgkBWCSAEBAQE3uGGELgQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,424,1257116400"; d="scan'208";a="17804512"
Received: from c-cf83e355.09-42-6e6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO
	lazlar.kicks-ass.net) ([85.227.131.207])
	by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2009 21:07:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4B2D3291.1010404@lazlarlyricon.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:45 +0100
From: Rolf Nielsen <listreader@lazlarlyricon.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>
References: <6c51dbb10912190642s43ec0f2bj69047a0d5a0690ae@mail.gmail.com>	<200912192018.59607.oloringr@gmail.com>
	<E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell>
In-Reply-To: <E7A4C254FF8D4B1AAB27E63078A83F3B@rivendell>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any chance ZFS becoming default?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:47 -0000

Reko Turja wrote:
>> under Other Kernel:
>> ZFS as default
> 
> So anyone running 32bit or under 2Gb of memory don't need to bother with 
> FreeBSD anymore after 9.0 RELEASE?

Since when does changing the default action imply making the previous 
default impossible or even difficult? And since when does adding an 
ability to a piece of software imply removing another? I can't find 
anything suggesting that support for UFS is to be removed by 9.0. 
Neither from the kernel or from sysinstall.