From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  1 14:02:46 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7641065674
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net)
Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
	(qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C258FC1D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  1 Feb 2009 14:02:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net)
Received: from OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11])
	by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id AcdX1b00D0EZKEL57e2moo; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000
Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11])
	by OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id Ae2l1b00N0FJTGg3Me2lb4; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000
Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <algo@daland.home>)
	id 1LTcuK-000PAn-2f; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:02:44 -0500
From: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>
To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-reply-to: <4985A8B7.2040307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	(ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de)
References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>	<200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>	<4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<E1LTU5c-000Jiu-PI@daland.home>
	<49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<E1LTbsO-000OYb-BL@daland.home>
	<4985A8B7.2040307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Message-Id: <E1LTcuK-000PAn-2f@daland.home>
Sender: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:02:44 -0500
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, alex-goncharov@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event	Extension"
 missing on display ":0.0".
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 -0000

,--- I/Alex (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:56:40 -0500) ----*
| All I was saying was that your ldd experiment was... hmm... not
| correct (if you agree with mine, of course). 
,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:47 +0100) ----*
| Saying, it was stupid? You're correct. It was stupid and, of course, it
| doesn't matter if the libs show up or not.

Not stupid -- you tried various things in desperation and hurry, and
reported your observations and thoughts.  It's normal :-)

| I thought, at the first shot, firefox3 binary needs to have a
| complete reference to all of its libraries, but thinking so leads
| the advantage of having dynamical loadable objects ad absurdum.

Glad this is cleared now!

-- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --