Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:57:15 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>, current@freebsd.org, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>, Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>, arch@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches Message-ID: <43DA7B1B.4090704@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <200601270927.33772.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20060125201450.GE25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20060127085653.GA51554@uk.tiscali.com> <43D9E1D2.6060207@rogers.com> <200601270927.33772.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > People with lots and lots of servers who need to keep the entire power load > down to avoid overloading their power source. Also, said people might care > about the cost of their power bills. > > Well thats fine and all, its not like the patch will prevent powerd from working, right? P.S. I don't know of any colo that charges for power usage.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43DA7B1B.4090704>