From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 27 19:57:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C5516A425 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 548A543D53 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:57:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 62239 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2006 19:57:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OAoEDrBJ2pjXNYAAF7sKgxb5T9NZowwiYbbcOsEKEpSZFIgds0Ymh27dKtD51QM+viDCXq8nqZMMIbg5zQIl8X5QqmQ+w7XF5/llBOSFyD3w7uT+H/OXEdxQnom19F5bFEmIsjVk88G//+UkbDflU5gPZom7ee7ATawvvqk8x+Q= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.30.133.184?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.30.133.184 with plain) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2006 19:57:08 -0000 Message-ID: <43DA7B1B.4090704@rogers.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:57:15 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <20060125201450.GE25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20060127085653.GA51554@uk.tiscali.com> <43D9E1D2.6060207@rogers.com> <200601270927.33772.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200601270927.33772.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John-Mark Gurney , current@freebsd.org, Brian Candler , Peter Jeremy , arch@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:57:11 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > People with lots and lots of servers who need to keep the entire power load > down to avoid overloading their power source. Also, said people might care > about the cost of their power bills. > > Well thats fine and all, its not like the patch will prevent powerd from working, right? P.S. I don't know of any colo that charges for power usage.