From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 26 10:50:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04475 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 10:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pike.cdrom.com (pike.cdrom.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04470 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 10:50:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@pike.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (murray@localhost) by pike.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA10696; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@pike.cdrom.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) From: Murray Stokely To: Manuel Bouyer cc: port-i386@netbsd.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AMD k6 and > 32Mb RAM In-Reply-To: <199801261707.SAA07023@chassiron.ensta.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk That was with very early K6's that you shouldn't be able to find on the market anymore. You should be able to find the exact stepping #'s of chips with the problem by searching Dejanews if you need to though. On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Manuel Bouyer wrote: % Does anybody know if a K6 can run with 64Mb (or more) of RAM ? I've heard that % there was a silicon bug in the earlier K6 that would make it not manage % properly the RAM, but I don't know if it has been fixed. Murray Stokely