From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Apr 5 2:48:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3237B423; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from netchild@leidinger.net) Received: from [194.97.50.136] (helo=mx3.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14l6NQ-00007Q-00; Thu, 05 Apr 2001 11:48:28 +0200 Received: from b8114.pppool.de ([213.7.129.20] helo=Magelan.Leidinger.net) by mx3.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14l6NP-0000WK-00; Thu, 05 Apr 2001 11:48:28 +0200 Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f359ctI09858; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:38:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200104050938.f359ctI09858@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:38:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Background Fsck To: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: mckusick@mckusick.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 5 Apr, Robert Watson wrote: > Another usability question. Was wondering about the possibility of > multiple background fsck's getting started at a time, et al, possibly due > to bad behavior by the user. Can the user get shot in the foot in the > following situations: [1-3] 4) They shutdown the machine while the background fsck is in progress. Bye, Alexander. -- Speak softly and carry a cellular phone. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message