From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:37:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5900D1E6D8F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mmPl1Ywtz4Lpm; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ilzux-0005ga-C6; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:37:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:37:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Simeo Reig Subject: Re: svn commit: r521562 - in head/java: . wildfly17 wildfly17/files Message-ID: <20191230183727.GH1258@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mmPl1Ywtz4Lpm X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:31 -0000 Hi! > Not complaining, but I wonder why we have so many versioned ports instead > of having just one wildfly and wildfly-devel. I guess Simoe has more context about this. > wildfly 18 is available, BTW. Yes, I'm just testbuilding that one. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 One year to go !