From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 6 06:34:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA24546 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 6 Apr 1998 06:34:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA24533 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 1998 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA07996; Mon, 6 Apr 1998 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Jamie Bowden cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdate for 2.2.6? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Apr 1998 09:26:54 EDT." <199804061325.JAA22597@gatekeeper.itribe.net> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 06:33:44 -0700 Message-ID: <7993.891869624@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG One hopes not, but I'm just trying to be conservative here and avoiding instilling any false hopes. Jordan > On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > No, there will be no 2.3. Whether or not 3.0 is "stable" or not at > > the outset will also just have to depend on a variety of factors and > > it's too early to say whether it'll be 3.0 or 3.0.5 or even 3.0.6 > > before it's safe to jump aboard with that branch. > > So we can expect a rerun of 2.0? > > -- > Jamie Bowden > Systems Administrator, iTRiBE.net > > If we've got to fight over grep, sign me up. But boggle can go. > -Ted Faber (on Hasbro's request for removal of /usr/games/boggle) > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message