From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 9 23:42:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA18143 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 23:42:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp6538.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.208.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA18129 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 23:42:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA06043; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 02:41:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Message-ID: <19980810024106.B4794@zappo> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 02:41:06 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Steve Price , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports submissions via /pub/FreeBSD/incoming References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Steve Price on Sun, Aug 09, 1998 at 08:16:02PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 09, 1998 at 08:16:02PM -0500, Steve Price wrote: [...] > I for one would like to put in my vote to change the > handbook to say that attaching the portball to the Already done. Check the handbook. Actually, it's been this way for a while. (Some) port submitters adapt only slowly, it seems. Feel free to chastize violators of the ports handbook guidelines. :-) -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message