Date: 23 Aug 2000 14:46:42 +0200 From: Roland Jesse <jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: ddd (was: Gimme FreeBSD anyday!) Message-ID: <0vpun0uoul.fsf_-_@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> In-Reply-To: Mark Ovens's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:00:45 %2B0100" References: <200008151718.e7FHIbb13082@mail.hiwaay.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008201325420.1774-100000@orthanc.dsl.gtei.net> <20000821144137.D13975@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000821160518.B20036@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000821180045.B258@parish>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Ovens <marko@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> Or eminently more sensible is to install ddd(1)
Whis is generally a good idea. But does it still puke on dynamically
linked libraries? I was once trying to debug a dynamically linked
binary and ddd simply ignored my $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and complained that
it cannot find a lib...so.
Roland
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0vpun0uoul.fsf_-_>