From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:24:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDE016A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EADD43D49 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CCPSE-0009yx-Kf; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:24:10 +0100 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:24:10 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Schnoopay Message-ID: <20040928212410.GX2493@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Schnoopay , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <4159BFE3.5030009@mackanics.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IGm81t4p5ot0iv02" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4159BFE3.5030009@mackanics.net> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:24:12 -0000 --IGm81t4p5ot0iv02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 03:47:47PM -0400, Schnoopay wrote: > I'm soon to be getting an Athlon64 and am debating whether to use the=20 > i386 or AMD64 versions of FreeBSD. I've been running -CURRENT (well, now= =20 > RELENF_5) since 5.0 DP1 on my current system and don't mind the=20 > occasional issues that come with doing so. I am curious however what=20 > will and will not work in the AMD64 port. My main concerns are KDE,=20 > Mozilla, oggenc and similar desktop apps. I know most ports I use are=20 > known to be working, and I believe that Linux32 compatability is in a=20 > testing phase currently, anything else I should know before making the=20 > move? Is there a web page somewhere that lists what ports are known=20 > working/not working on AMD64? None of the JVMs or Scheme ports work on amd64, which is a shame. Other than that, everything I use is fine (KDE is definitely fine). Ceri --=20 It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. --IGm81t4p5ot0iv02 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWdZ6ocfcwTS3JF8RAtZJAKCENIEmAx2lB0aukvW85PZndVa2pACfYueA 2raRqKXtUUpYYx7wynL1Zc8= =mdmj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IGm81t4p5ot0iv02--