Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:42:38 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" <zszalbot@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dedicated server specs / 7.0-Release Message-ID: <94136a2c0803181142n48af9905n491129d13e1bd134@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4a89d1190803181139l65011bd7kf38f4540354f90b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <94136a2c0803181033i12162d3ep1e127fa7e1925a2b@mail.gmail.com> <4a89d1190803181139l65011bd7kf38f4540354f90b8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hello, 2008/3/18, Christian Zachariasen <chrizach@gmail.com>: > Depending on what you're doing you might clarify what you are planning on > doing with the disks. > Are you running them in any form of RAID? > > In a some cases it might be smarter to go for "better" drives (made for > operating 24/7). > That being said, I've often used shitty drives myself on servers that have > been up for ages at a time. Right! It will be used for hosting a couple of domains and quite extensive email service. I was planning to use the second HD to replicate data in case of emergency. What would you advise instead or is there a way to make the two drives operate in RAID? I do not know much abaout RAIDs I am afraid. Thanks! -- Zbigniew Szalbot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94136a2c0803181142n48af9905n491129d13e1bd134>