From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 15:28:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AB91065673; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C0D8FC0C; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q91FSB1r030643; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:28:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id q91FSBdT030642; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:28:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:28:11 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20121001152811.GA30598@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <5066C652.9020904@omnilan.de> <201210010849.36742.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210010849.36742.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mps in GENERIC, only in amd64? (RELENG_9_1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:28:18 -0000 On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:49:36 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:58:42 am Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > accidentally I saw that mps is included in sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC, but > > not in sys/i386/conf/GENERIC. > > Is this intended? > > Have you tested it on i386? From the log message, Ken (cc'd) only added it > on amd64 as it hadn't been tested on i386. That was certainly the case two years ago. Since then, though, I think the LSI folks have tested it on i386. If we get reports of success using it on i386, I don't see any issue with putting it in GENERIC. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@FreeBSD.ORG