From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Sep 15 03:02:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E3D3EBCB2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Br7Ln47sGz4hK4 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:02:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08F32BST057368 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:02:12 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-stable@lists.invis.net Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 08F32HJH038315 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:02:17 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Cannot find announcement that min supported i386 CPU is now i686 To: Charles Lecklider , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4460db23-9a29-7972-1b41-74585764a5d7@lists.invis.net> <20200831205136.GA15141@elch.exwg.net> <2986c4ef-6e73-50f9-215e-20e8a9793434@lists.invis.net> <6bd2c4f6-5ce1-5a0d-14b3-71831a0443f4@grosbein.net> <934c2a63-d3b0-dafb-08cf-8572bb313d03@lists.invis.net> <4873c4bd-abdc-f566-8038-e51c755b1222@grosbein.net> <35a18110-3252-2f53-ebae-b9a893776b62@grosbein.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <54ad71f5-cd48-1d74-816f-cc17cdfda4c8@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:02:13 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35a18110-3252-2f53-ebae-b9a893776b62@grosbein.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UPPERCASE_50_75 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * 0.0 UPPERCASE_50_75 message body is 50-75% uppercase * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Br7Ln47sGz4hK4 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.04)[0.040]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[empty SPF record]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 03:02:26 -0000 15.09.2020 9:42, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> I tried that on my workstation (dual Xeon, lots of RAM) but couldn't get >> it to compile for i586 - various things kept bailing out. Note that I use multiple WITHOUT_XXX knobs documented in src.conf(5) to decrease both build time and size of resulting image, maybe some excluded code really has problems for i386, can't tell. For CONF_BUILD (addition to src.conf for buildworld): WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS= WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES= WITHOUT_TESTS= MODULES_WITH_WORLD= WITHOUT_ACCT= WITHOUT_AMD= WITHOUT_APM= WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG= WITHOUT_ATM= WITHOUT_AUDIT= WITHOUT_AUTHPH= WITHOUT_AUTOFS= WITHOUT_BHYVE= WITHOUT_BOOTPARAMD= WITHOUT_BOOTPD= WITHOUT_BSDINSTALL= WITHOUT_BSNMP= WITHOUT_CALENDAR= WITHOUT_CCD= #WITHOUT_CDDL= WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL= WITHOUT_CPP= WITHOUT_CTM= WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES= WITHOUT_DICT= WITHOUT_EXAMPLES= WITHOUT_FLOPPY= WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE= WITHOUT_GAMES= WITHOUT_GCOV= WITHOUT_GDB= WITHOUT_GROFF= WITHOUT_HAST= WITGOUT_HESIOD= WITHOUT_HTML= WITHOUT_HYPERV= WITHOUT_IPFILTER= WITHOUT_IPX= WITHOUT_ISCSI= WITHOUT_JAIL= WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS= WITHOUT_LLDB= WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_ALL= WITH_LLVM_TARGET_X86= WITHOUT_LOCATE= WITHOUT_LS_COLORS= WITHOUT_MAN= WITH_MAN_UTILS= WITHOUT_NCP= WITHOUT_NDIS= WITHOUT_NETCAT= WITHOUT_NIS= WITHOUT_NLS= WITHOUT_NLS_CATALOGS= WITHOUT_NS_CACHING= WITH_OPENSSH_NONE_CIPHER= WITHOUT_PC_SYSINSTALL= WITHOUT_PF= WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS= WITHOUT_PMC= WITHOUT_PORTSNAP= WITHOUT_PPP= WITHOUT_PROFILE= WITHOUT_QUOTAS= WITHOUT_RBOOTD= WITHOUT_RCS= WITHOUT_RESCUE= WITHOUT_ROUTED= WITHOUT_SHAREDOCS= WITHOUT_SVNLITE= WITHOUT_TALK= WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL= WITHOUT_TESTS= WITHOUT_TEXTPROC= WITHOUT_TIMED= WITHOUT_VT= MODULES_OVERRIDE=cryptodev zfs opensolaris And: CONF_INSTALL=" $CONF_BUILD WITHOUT_BINUTILS= WITHOUT_CLANG= WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL= WITHOUT_CXX= WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN= WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB= " >> It would compile i386 for i686, but not i586. Have you tried it with 11.4? Not sure what you meant here. ARCH may be i386 (32 bit) or amd64 (64 bit), however i586 is not a name for ARCH but for CPUTYPE only (not same thing).