Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:59:33 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        dmaddox@conterra.com
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp 
Message-ID:  <199909261859.LAA13355@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:55:57 EDT." <19990926145557.B430@dmaddox.conterra.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 11:41:14AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > 
> > PnP is an infrastructure facility used by drivers to detect and 
> > configure hardware.  The side-effect you were relying on was that the 
> > old code would indiscriminately configure any and all PnP hardware 
> > regardless of whether a driver had requested it to.
> 
> Why is this not desirable?

I've already asked you to do your own research, and I meant it.  The 
simple answer is "if we don't have a [working] driver for it, we don't 
want it".

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909261859.LAA13355>