From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Aug 13 19:40:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1783037B409; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:40:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv@worldnet.att.net) Received: from worldnet.att.net ([32.100.199.162]) by mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010814024025.WCSF8490.mtiwmhc23.worldnet.att.net@worldnet.att.net>; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:40:25 +0000 Received: by worldnet.att.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DD76250D30; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:40:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:40:26 -0400 From: parv To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Cc: Nik Clayton , f-doc Subject: Re: (website) move towards xhtml Message-ID: <20010813224026.B60454@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: "Gary W. Swearingen" , Nik Clayton , f-doc References: <20010812200925.A49266@moo.holy.cow> <20010813104836.X50182@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010813075517.A16251@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from swear@aa.net on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:29:48AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org this was, on the fateful occasion around Aug 13 14:29 -0400, sent by Gary W. Swearingen > > parv writes: > ... > > advantages: > > - w3c's update of html 4.x; html 4 has been deprecated in favor of > > xhtml. (inferred from the 1st link below) > > Doesn't look like an advantage to me. Fairly irrelevant. well, having the time to convert before html standard becomes unsupported seems to be an advantage to me at least. > > - xhtml-strict dtd takes us towards xml; in the end will fit much more > > nicely w/ css than existing html (again w3c propaganda)... but who > > knows what else would have, or have not, had happened by then? > > XHTML, strict or not, *is* XML as I understand it. That was the main > advantage for my usage. It allows one to use XML-savy tools and > libraries on it. But since you've already got your source in SGML, you > don't gain much from that feature. It might help people grabbing your > *HTML. yes, that's my general idea too. -- so, do you like word games or scrabble? - parv To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message