From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  4 17:04:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351B1213
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2014 17:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1B82C85
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2014 17:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s74H4itf092242
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:04:44 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192382] new_xorg pkg repository for 9.3 doesnt contain new
 version of ATI drivers
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:04:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-192382-13-igq5w5plyj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192382-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192382-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:04:45 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192382

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marino@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
this is known I think.

The repo can only have either old or new, but not both.  And it affects more
than just one port.

It's an entire set of either "old" or "new".  

Do you want me to pass this to X11?  I don't think anything is going to change,
it just "is".  People wanting new will just have to build from source with the
proper make.conf settings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.