From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 27 8: 5:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4460237B61E for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03013 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:05:47 -0700 Message-ID: <39804FCB.BEC962D7@urx.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:05:47 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: updating ports after upgrade (was Re: README.TXT and RELNOTES.TXT not updated before release tag?) References: <677.964647898@localhost> <397F6235.C68E3DD6@urx.com> <14720.17918.627652.285537@onceler.kcilink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>>> "KS" == Kent Stewart writes: > > KS> The port people seemed to be keeping up in most cases but I was > KS> wondering if there was a policy on rebuilding your ports on new > KS> releases or simply letting well enough alone until you find something > KS> that is broken. > > If it ain't broke, don't fix it is my general motto WRT computers. As > mentioned earlier, about the only thing that needs to get updated is > lsof since it is tied to the OS version identifier string. It might > still work but will complain. Other than that, if something is broken > or you need a new feature from a newer version, then that's a reason > to upgrade it. Otherwise why waste the time? I have a tendancy to follow that policy. There are some areas such as graphics and others that are always improving. I've found over the years that it is better to keep uptodate with in a window of what is current. This is especially true if your hardware is starting to get a little out of date because the people will be programming for the new stuff and forget about the old. If you wait too long, you can be totally cut off. FWIW, I tried to update lsof and was successfull on 2 machines but the build died on the 3rd machine with ===> Building for lsof-4.50 (cd lib; make DEBUG="-O" CFGF="-pipe -DFREEBSDV=200 -DHASFDESCFS=1 -DHASFDLINK - DHASPROCFS -DHAS9660FS -DHASIPv6 -DLSOF_VSTR=\"4.1-STABLE\"") cc -pipe -DFREEBSDV=200 -DHASFDESCFS=1 -DHASFDLINK -DHASPROCFS -DHAS9660FS -DHA SIPv6 -DLSOF_VSTR="4.1-STABLE" -I/usr/include -I/usr/src/sys -O -c ckkv.c In file included from ../dlsof.h:110, from ../lsof.h:167, from ckkv.c:43: /usr/include/ufs/mfs/mfsnode.h:49: field `buf_queue' has incomplete type In file included from ../dlsof.h:121, from ../lsof.h:167, from ckkv.c:43: /usr/include/nfs/nfs.h:207: syntax error before `NFSKERBKEY_T' /usr/include/nfs/nfs.h:218: syntax error before `NFSKERBKEY_T' In file included from ../dlsof.h:195, from ../lsof.h:167, from ckkv.c:43: /usr/include/vm/vm_map.h:180: field `vm_pmap' has incomplete type *** Error code 1 \ The Makefile was looking for a 4.51 file that it can't find but is satisfied with the 4.50 file. Kent > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. > Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-545-6996 > GPG & MIME spoken here http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ Bomber dropping fire retardant in front of Hanford Wild fire. http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/bomber.jpg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message