From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 31 01:29:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A075106568B for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE048FC19 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBV1TURn073541; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:29:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id nBV1TUAa073538; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:29:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:29:30 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: doug@fledge.watson.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:29:30 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xorg-7.4_2 error (was xorg 7.4 questions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:29:38 -0000 On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, doug@safeport.com wrote: >> After updating ports, 'portsdb -Fu' and 'portversion -vL=' will show what's >> outdated. (That's with portupgrade installed. Some would have you believe >> it's second in evil only to HAL. Maybe true, but it works.) >> >> And then 'portupgrade -r portname' (or 'portupgrade -ar', if you like) >> should upgrade the outdated stuff and everything that depends on it. And -P >> or -PP might help by retrieving packages, although I haven't tried that in >> years. > > This includes libc? man 2 libc Doh, I was thinking of ports, not system. Some ports have code to check for system version requirements, and I'd expect packages to do the same thing. But they're moving targets, and developers and porters can't check all the combinations. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA