Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Linh Pham <lplist@closedsrc.org>
To:        Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Marc W <mwlist@lanfear.com>, Kyle <freebsd@sysmach.com>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: the AMD factor in FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104171507100.44584-100000@q.closedsrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171210170.4840-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001-04-17, Vincent Poy scribbled:

# Thanks for the insight but what about in a Single CPU environment?

The AMD Athlon tends to beat the Pentium III in most cases (when
matching Mhz... faster Athlons will fly by a Pentium III without a
problem). The Pentium 4 tends to beat the Athlon in memory bandwidth
intensive cases (ie: MPEG-4 encoding, some streaming media apps) and in
Quake III (that's because the Q3 code is heavily optimized for the P3/P4
processors anyways).

The only thing truly holding back the Athlon are the chipsets. Via
chipsets aren't nearly as good as AMD's or Intel's (definitely nowhere
as good as Intel's).

-- 
Linh Pham
[lplist@closedsrc.org]

// 404b - Brain not found


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0104171507100.44584-100000>