From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 18:43:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E1E106567E for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us [204.184.27.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9671C8FC13 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us) Received: from mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (localhost.bloomfield.k12.mo.us [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840AC95861 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:44:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 204.184.27.217 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sgmayo) by mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:44:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <1105.204.184.27.217.1216233869.squirrel@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:44:29 -0500 (CDT) From: sgmayo@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us To: questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: nsswitch.conf man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:43:41 -0000 I don't see anything in the man page about adding ldap into the nsswitch.conf file. Is that something that I can do so that I can get applications to use my openldap? I would assume I could add something to the affect of: passwd files ldap group files ldap but all I see is compat, files, nis and dns for options. Thanks for any help on this. -- Scott Mayo - System Administrator Bloomfield Schools PH: 573-568-5669 FA: 573-568-4565 Question: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Answer: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?