From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 10:30:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873C91065670 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521318FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mABAU8cu038291 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mABAU8gc038288; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 GMT Message-Id: <200811111030.mABAU8gc038288@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Guido Falsi Cc: Subject: ports/128776: [PATCH] comms/openobex: Add USB support to OPENOBEX transports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Guido Falsi List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/128776; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Guido Falsi To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, samm@os2.kiev.ua Cc: Subject: ports/128776: [PATCH] comms/openobex: Add USB support to OPENOBEX transports Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:22:39 +0100 I don't know what happened to the missing email. I approved the patch, but don't own any USB obex enabled applicance to test it. Just checked it compiles and does not break anything. Should we bump portrevision to let users know of the new functionality? What's the policy in this kind of situation? -- Guido Falsi