From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 24 10:42:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A4BA016A4B3; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AF1FA43FFB; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E895465444; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 93708-04; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (lardystuffer.demon.co.uk
	[212.228.40.202])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA8A665410; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:21 +0100 (BST)
Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7146731; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:16 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:42:16 +0100
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
Message-ID: <20030924174216.GL650@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
References: <200309241429.h8OETrhk097904@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<3F71ADCA.7090408@tenebras.com> <20030924162111.GA23542@sunbay.com>
	<3F71C733.6070708@tenebras.com> <20030924170442.GC23542@sunbay.com>
	<20030925012033.A567@grosbein.pp.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030925012033.A567@grosbein.pp.ru>
cc: security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:42:28 -0000

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:20:33AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:04:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> 
> > Right.  But static ARP means something different.  It means
> > that the APR table is frozen, but system will still reply
> > to ARP requests for its addresses, which is not done if
> > IFF_NOARP flag is set on an interface.
> 
> Realization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/40763
> 
> In production for years. Of course, it is better to apply patch from SA.

Thanks for your PR.  I'll review this along with ru's patch once I get it.

BMS