From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 13:17:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA2D16A4CE; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us [192.149.244.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916AA43D4F; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:17:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us) Received: from notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (notes9a.okladot.state.ok.us [10.36.36.31])PAA09170; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:16:52 -0600 Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us ([199.27.9.37]) by notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2003121615165912:303687 ; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:16:59 -0600 Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0) id EB1345C29; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:17:15 -0600 (CST) To: John Baldwin From: pseniura@techie.com In-Reply-To: References: <3FDAE8E9.7020709@gmx.de> Message-Id: <20031216211715.EB1345C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:17:15 -0600 (CST) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Notes9c/ODOT(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 12/16/2003 03:16:59 PM,2003) at 12/16/2003 03:17:00 PM, Serialize complete at 12/16/2003 03:17:00 PM cc: Michael Class cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: pseniura@techie.com Subject: RE: Missing pcm interrupts with ACPI - missing attachments X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pseniura@techie.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:17:35 -0000 Please pardon my barging-in here, but I'm intensely interested in this... On 15-Dec-2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 13-Dec-2003 Michael Class wrote: > > Hello current, > > > > unfortunately the attachments of my last mail did not make it to the > > list. I have put them now on a web server: > > > > https://michaelclass.homeip.net/fbsd > > > > Michael > > Ok, this is going to be a bit more complicated to fix. Basically, your > MADT doesn't tell us that IRq's 9 and 10 are supposed to be level triggered > though your MP Table does tell us that. At the moment, we don't support > using the attributes from ACPI IRQ resources to bubble back up to the PIC > driver to re-program the int pins. For now don't use ACPI. I will try to > contact you later when I have patches that you can test. Thanks. Could I be put on an "interested parties" list, too, please? I've just finished diagnosing a similar problem, on the -questions maillist at this thread, if you'd like to read it: Thank you, either way. -- Paul Seniura System Specialist State of Okla. D.O.T.