From owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Thu Oct 20 00:12:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3834FC19EF8 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcestaff@shaw.ca) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B365338 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcestaff@shaw.ca) Received: from VCMCE110228 ([96.53.207.109]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id x0xkbSlD0Ijjwx0xnbo4ku; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:12:04 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20150330; t=1476922324; bh=Q08XRb6Hqpt3SVuupVrbfyIV8AcaKDDtWBCxHRuglJk=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=gJRycNi3Wo/P1LHP+3g5QeBpPHad/37hj4fPq2bHx0igkosOJWIocwTWXEYG/oWYQ zNB0a4QpwlCTIQCwJR6LWHJaZHLdUXvP6gagpGjOazzzthrGrZMQbCDjJtarMzpCdU qCV0l2J7lgHamL7Xy9pvjmSe8B+pAAZGAjci/tbeReiaVkD51XqiVi7P0wW5TO+GPT CJyPLyEDpx6S7truBul5TNXsx+sFJIQtCesOcNmCascjdVcwNHnyHVwUXAU6BdO2l/ rWLrXh4lAZvjhfr5KqI/xuRCGjyJx7KnD34nZlftUEqW6BV1rerm/D1T0hVQ3aSZRb s7n9Bw+w7bkzg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=dtuZMBo4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=wUBskxdo7/hGrCCpt51ZWg==:117 a=wUBskxdo7/hGrCCpt51ZWg==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=oxtLoEQ2AAAA:8 a=zepT9vvo_yAr_GgBjGQA:9 a=qxRwEEhy_otaL1Ep:21 a=7grR0kkgO2Xch9b4:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=tI0Gb_2qAAAA:8 a=GV7ZK-Zi6LVPGPmVfEUA:9 a=4iFJinC7v0DYHgGv:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=4o5yfQ92oOGWSoZ-H8Ji:22 a=GrKeae-oFL7tvdZ2WQas:22 Message-ID: <7FE5511E15C54718B2BC1E4D2745BC17@VCMCE110228> From: "Shannon @ shaw" To: References: <4D4F63AFE85D40E5B884B77B09E0D74A@VCMCE110228> <5438b38d53bf0bc58fe0fd78712280ae@deerfieldhosting.com> In-Reply-To: <5438b38d53bf0bc58fe0fd78712280ae@deerfieldhosting.com> Subject: Re: 553 errors Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:11:57 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfE9CsGN+GoU+2A2IMoLDudiwrLk+cWjHNkygWCmI0q81UWTMWXOwEDq2lIbfdF4XhpuD3uuWQmIutBoar3UKmgyzLkIT6uhZptLuC4dovHhABUcz7J74 oPcv4uGrnyKd06HlGJTSqkXqBBrfNAh4uuknkWlH1mPPS7KgePIZ7XAw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:12:11 -0000 I didn=E2=80=99t really ask for a simple answer... It=E2=80=99s not so much the understanding, it=E2=80=99s more like = laziness. It=E2=80=99s a mail server I built in 1998 and = rebuilt/upgraded in 2006 and it pretty much just sits there and runs. I don=E2=80=99t have to look at it a lot. So my skills are not = =E2=80=98fresh=E2=80=99. ----------------------------------- I was browsing through maillog but there=E2=80=99s so many properly = rejected mails it=E2=80=99s kind of depressing. such as: Oct 19 00:12:56 mail sm-mta[27488]: ruleset=3Dcheck_relay, = arg1=3D[101.200.123.160], arg2=3D127.0.0.4, relay=3D[101.200.123.160], = reject=3D550 5.7.1 Rejected: 101.200.123.160 listed at = sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org =20 When I grep=E2=80=99d maillog for the problem domain none found = =E2=80=93 but maybe too big of a delay between it happening and being = reported to me... =20 =20 Thank You!!! =20 Shannon Wheeler =20 From: Dennis=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:42 PM To: Shannon @ shaw=20 Subject: Re: 553 errors Hi, Yes, you have a misconfiguration. That you are asking the question = means, with all due respect, that your understanding of how mail servers = work is probably not sufficient for a simple answer. But to give you = one anyway, there is some problem with the MTA (mail transport agent) = you are using being able to verify the recipient address. You should be = looking in the logs produced by your MTA for more details. --- -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Dennis Mathiasen ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Doug Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 5:17 PM=20 To: Shannon @ shaw=20 Subject: Re: 553 errors=20 Check your maillog file in /var/log for error messages for that email. = There should be something helpful there.