Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:32:48 +0200
From:      Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
To:        Joachim Durchholz <joachim@durchholz.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: issues with syslogd include redirecting wg0 output to custom location
Message-ID:  <20240919223248.Hr-N0jar@steffen%sdaoden.eu>
In-Reply-To: <627f0b4f-6d55-4872-9435-07109a9a6aa0@durchholz.org>
References:  <f1eb51eb-6934-4717-bca5-31f24a6988d1@osfux.nl> <ea1b110e-2605-4b81-8eb8-df4e79821c17@quip.cz> <4250c967-61c7-419a-b542-455a8f655dd1@osfux.nl> <0019d1f0-0b84-448d-8ecd-5b1619103139@osfux.nl> <20240918225906.Npft_PNY@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <20240918230901.P2V-MyI6@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <627f0b4f-6d55-4872-9435-07109a9a6aa0@durchholz.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joachim Durchholz wrote in
 <627f0b4f-6d55-4872-9435-07109a9a6aa0@durchholz.org>:
 |On 19.09.24 01:09, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> Ha.
 |> 
 |> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 |>   <20240918225906.Npft_PNY@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
 |> 
 |> I got back
 |> 
 |>    <mail@osfux.nl>: host vm1982.osfux.nl[79.99.187.212] said: 554 \
 |>    5.7.1 Service
 |>        unavailable; Client host [217.144.132.164] blocked using sbl.spamh\
 |>        aus.org;
 |>        Error: open resolver; https://check.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/141.1\
 |>        01.75.8/
 |>        (in reply to RCPT TO command)
 |
 |Oh, that's a problem on vm1982.osfux.nl, who rely on Spamhaus to 
 |identify IP addresses that have sent spam in the past.
 |Spamhaus is pretty well-known for being unreliable; the spam filters in 

Ooh?  For my postfix i use

  smtpd_client_restrictions =
  #   permit_inet_interfaces, OR
     permit_mynetworks,
     permit_tls_clientcerts,
  #[RELAY]   permit_sasl_authenticated,
     check_client_access lmdb:$meta_directory/client_restrict,
     reject_unknown_client_hostname,
     # in case you want reject DNS blacklists rather than greylist them,
     # exchange sleep (maybe) and uncomment the lines below
     sleep 1,
     #reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
     #reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
     reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,

zen. since 2015 and it never caused problems, as far as i know?
(It does, however, not find that many positives .. i have none in
my logs, which however go back two days only (rotated logs go out
via email, and rotate keeps five).)  Maybe i should simply stop
using that.

     #reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
     #reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
     reject_unauth_pipelining,
     #reject
     permit

 |your mail client work much better, and if they misclassify a mail you 
 |can easily find it in the spam folder instead of rejecting the mail and 
 |making life difficult for the admin on the sending side.

Maybe i really should do this, too.

 |Regards,
 |Jo

Ciao Jo,

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240919223248.Hr-N0jar>