From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 09:01:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B2C106564A for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from myself@rdtan.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556DD8FC17 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1498258gyg.13 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.92.18 with SMTP id p18mr6008921ybb.148.1285405305413; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhost.local ([175.144.151.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w24sm2079028ybk.1.2010.09.25.02.01.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9DBA74.6080400@rdtan.net> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:01:40 +0800 From: Edward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kojevnikov References: <20100924180828.GA92638@comcast.net> <1285352213.22845.0.camel@xenon> <20100924184921.GB38590@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <4C9D8A61.4020206@rdtan.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Web feed for /usr/ports/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:01:46 -0000 On 25/09/10 3:00, Alexander Kojevnikov wrote: >>> directly, I'm going to keep it updated and if necessary will upgrade >>> the RootBSD VPS it's hosted on. >> Why not redirect the feed to feedburner? It's a free server from google, >> fast & furious. > I don't really see the point in relying on another service. The feed > is cached, for most requests the script just reads and prints a file, > it's not hard for the server at all. > I thought you were concern about the extra bandwidth & processing that would incur by providing this great idea so I suggested to move the RSS part to feedburner. If this is not the case, ignore it ;) Ah, I forgot to say "thanks". This make reading /usr/ports/UPDATING interesting again. :)