Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:17:26 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> To: "Ilya A. Arkhipov" <rum1cro@yandex.ru> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default? Message-ID: <519DDEA6.4030106@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <758641369300207@web4g.yandex.ru> References: <20130523054541.GH96836@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <758641369300207@web4g.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/23/2013 11:10, Ilya A. Arkhipov wrote: > I think it is not good idea, because if user don't know regarding options in ports he should do a make config and if it not exist should do a make install in this case we have two action.. > Maybe other way for fix these frequent "popping" add needed options to make.conf I like the suggestion that if the dialog consists only of globally set options (NLS, DOC, etc) then it shouldn't appear by default. I also think Ilya has a point in general -- how does one know that there are options available to set in the case of default is "no pop?". There would have to be some sort of announcement that along the lines of "no configuration found, using default settings" so the user would have some sign. Even if the configuration is found, it would still be nice to be informed that a port has options (maybe part of pre-configure?) John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519DDEA6.4030106>