From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 28 19:46:36 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3705637B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8278043FB1
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:35 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.8/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2T3kWAm079930;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2T3kRTF079929;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:27 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Message-ID: <20030329034627.GC37614@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <20030326130118.8374.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
	<20030326220934.398c7455.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030326220934.398c7455.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
cc: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
cc: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org
cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for
	__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:46:38 -0000

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other
> optimizations beneath "-O" there will be (clueless or smart... does it
> really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on
> everything

Not to mention bullshit ones like "-O9".  I see that all the time.  What
do these poeple think they are buying with that?????

GCC should stop accepting -O values higher than what does anything.