From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 13 17:22:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from pendragon.tacni.net (mail.tacni.net [216.178.136.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1FC237B401 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:22:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from needo@cerebro.superhero.org) Received: (qmail 49899 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2001 00:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerebro.superhero.org) (216.201.173.186) by ns2.sohos.net with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 00:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1473 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jun 2001 00:24:27 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:24:26 -0500 From: Erich Zigler To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: An interesting read... Message-ID: <20010613192426.B1035@superhero.org> Mail-Followup-To: Erich Zigler , freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy. X-Jacob: Hi Jacob! X-Shane: Hi Shane! Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If anyone has a subscription to the magazine publication Sys Admin there is a very interesting article in this month's issue. The author compared Windows 2000, Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD. I'm taking the results of said tests with a grain of salt. Considering that FreeBSD was the lowest in almost everything. Including network performance. They showed that Windows 2000 even beat FreeBSD in this arena. It's worth a read. -- Erich Zigler Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'n' Roll..... take the drugs out, leaves more time for the other two. -- Steven Tyler To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message